PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V7 2004 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE
The E-Sylum: Volume 7, Number 5, February 1, 2004, Article 14 MORE ON PETER ROSA COPIES John M. Kleeberg writes: "Dick Johnson wrote me and asked that I post more information on Peter Rosa (1926-1990). Much information about Rosa can be found in Wayne Sayles' book, Classical Deception, which catalogues Rosa's copies of ancient coins. In the Colonial Newsletter for April 2002 I published what information I could gather about Rosa's copies of colonial and territorial coins. Les Elam, Bill Metcalf, Eric Newman, Ken Bressett and Wayne Sayles made many helpful suggestions that went into that article. Rosa worked for the stamping and casting firm of Taylor Industries, with offices at 250 West Broadway and a manufactory on Staten Island; he resided in the Bronx. His firm, the "Becker Manufacturing Company," was called that because he saw himself as the heir to the German diesinker (and friend of Goethe) Carl Wilhelm Becker, whose copies of ancient coins (and early thalers and siege pieces) can be so deceptive. The name may have also been chosen for a second reference to ancient coins: its initials are "BMC," which in numismatic literature refers to the British Museum Catalogue. People who prepare copies often do not use traditional minting technology, but adapt the technology they know best. This makes it difficult to unravel how the copies were made. What I think Rosa did was to make a cast of the original coin using dental alginate. He then used the dental alginate to make a metal positive copy. The positive copy was used to make one to one transfer dies. He would touch up the die by hand. One method he used was to strike each side of the coin individually, out of sheets of lead; he would trim off the scissel and solder together the two remaining pieces. The lead would then be covered over with a metallic paint. Later he would cover the lead with a thin sheet of silver, so the obverse would appear to be a silver coin, but one would see it was lead when one turned it over. Note that Rosa's method results in coins that have elements of both a cast and a struck copy; one of those instances where the old joke, "the obverse is cast but the reverse is struck," is true. It is possible, however, that the Rosa pieces that show this treatment date from the 1980s, when he sold uniface pieces because the numismatic press would no longer accept his advertisements for two sided copies; the uniface pieces were then soldered together by subsequent owners. An odd thing about the Rosa dies is that they are much larger than the coins they struck; the coin is a small incuse portion in the center of the die. Rosa had access to a Janvier lathe that allowed him to blow up and reduce designs: thus he could create multiples and fractions of coins where only one denomination was known. He also had some method of creating a collar die, because the reeding I have seen on his territorial gold coins (notably a Kellogg $20) is excellent. Wayne Sayles told me of another example of Rosa's ability to apply designs to the edge: he has seen Rosa copies of British Museum coins where Rosa provided a lettered edge giving the BMC number of the original. For the World of Coins Exhibit that was installed in 1983, the American Numismatic Society for security purposes had Rosa make copies of gold coins and displayed the copies (properly labeled as such). The Rosa copies were easily recognizable by their bright orange color. Although his California private gold pieces are not deceptive in their appearance; they are made out of base metal, and have that bright orange color; he also struck territorial gold pieces in copper. An example is a Kellogg & Co. double eagle of 1854. The copper variety can be ascribed to Rosa because of certain defects that also appear on the goldine versions: pimples along the cheekbone and a straight, horizontal raised cut in the middle of the neck. A researcher who is not careful might think the Rosa copper fake was an unreported Kellogg pattern. The 1804 large cent is an interesting discovery. I had not hitherto known that Rosa made copies of federal coins. Since it is uniface, it may be one of his 1980s products. A lot of Rosa copies are being sold on the Internet at present; many are second and third generation casts made from Rosa's first generation copies. Rosa is one of the leading sources of the New Hampshire 1776 WM copy, which causes so much trouble. Just the other week I saw one posted as genuine where the consignor observed that the white metal base was visible below the copper patination: this, of course, is not an eighteenth century technique, but is one of the techniques used by Rosa. Eric Newman found a Rosa price list in his files that listed colonial copies, numbered from 2 through 189; copies of an 8 reales and 8 escudos; and two territorial gold copies (including a Parsons bar). Many numbers were missing, since those pieces had already sold out. I published this in my Colonial Newsletter article. I hope that people will dig up more price lists and Rosa advertisements so that we can produce a complete listing of Rosa?s colonial and territorial (and federal) copies. I know that the Colonial Coin Collectors Club at one point was photographing copies to compile a database. Richard D. Kenney?s pamphlet on the classic struck colonial copies is helpful, but there are many additional copies that need to be listed. The ANS has tray after tray of colonial copies. Does anyone know who made the copies for the Copley Coin Company in Boston in the early 1960s? They resemble Rosa's work, but could have been made by someone else." Wayne Homren, Editor The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org. To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor at this address: whomren@coinlibrary.com To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum | |
PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V7 2004 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE