PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V7 2004 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE
The E-Sylum: Volume 7, Number 33, August 15, 2004, Article 21 MORE ON THE "E" AND "L" COUNTERSTAMPS Responding to Mark Borckardt's comments regarding the E and L counterstamps, Tom DeLorey writes: "Although a few old Mint dies were floating around in numismatic circles back in the 19th Century, the hand punching of the lettering in slightly variable positions would have made it necessary to find the precise die that struck this small hoard of high grade coins, and not just any reverse die of this type. Also, a private counterstamper would have had no need to find and use a reverse die. Judging from Brunk counterstamping was rather common in the 19th Century, and nobody seemed to mind if the coin so marked came out slightly bent or cup-shaped. As to the suggestion that a soft (as in softer than the coin) base could have been used, I have done a number of counterstamps over the years, using either an anvil or a block of wood as my base, and the only thing that did not warp was a gold Krugerrand." Wayne Homren, Editor The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org. To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor at this address: whomren@coinlibrary.com To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum | |
PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V7 2004 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE