PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V7 2004 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE
The E-Sylum: Volume 7, Number 46, November 14, 2004, Article 22 UPSETTING MACHINES: HOW AND WHY Dick Johnson writes: "I accept Chris Faulkner's request for information on the upsetting machine. We cannot say it was invented, it was more like "developed." But we do know who should receive credit - Matthew Boulton! If there is one person who was responsible for modern coins and coining technology it was Matthew Boulton. Every numismatist should build a shrine to this one man -- we would not have modern coins, or perhaps, modern numismatics -- without this manufacturing genius. (I will put his picture on my wall next to Leonard Forrer who is my hero for compiling a directory of world coin and medal artists, what I am trying to do for American artists). [And a thank you also, to Dick Doty for his fantastic 1998 book on Matthew Boulton "The Soho Mint" - Dick, send me your picture, I'll put it next to the others!] Before Matthew Boulton, coins were essentially struck on the manual screw presses. Blanks were fed by hand one at a time. I won't say it was a slow process, I was amazed to learn they could strike as many as 20 to 30 a minute!, as several men swung the arms of the screw press around and back while the "coin setter" retrieved the struck coin and inserted the next blank. They had great rhythm! Boulton took his partner James Watt's invention, the steam engine, eliminated the men swinging the arms and applied steam power to the screw press. Boulton learned of Jean Pierre Droz's (and Gengembre's) invention at the Paris Mint of an automatic feed and delivery system which could be attached to the screw press. Boulton hired Droz in 1790 for his Soho Mint in Birmingham (Droz makes improvements, engraved some dies, but returns to France nine years later). Existing blanks at first jammed the press (imagine those, mint error collectors!) They needed blanks in quantity that were uniform and perfectly round for automatic feed. Cause of the trouble were the burrs around the trailing edge of the blank from the blanking die shearing through the metal strip. At first they hired young Birmingham boys, even 8 to 10 years old, to put a handful of blanks in a leather bag and shake the hell out of the bag. The blanks knocked against each other and "deburred" the edges. Remember this is the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, so they had to find a better IR way. They did this by putting more blanks in a barrel and rotated the barrel a process similar today called "barrel tumbling" which is speeded up by adding steel balls smaller than the blanks so they can be sieved out later]. This action also deburrs the blanks. By 1797 Boulton's team had developed a machine he called a "rimmer" " still called that in England today " here in the colonies we call it an "upsetting machine." [I like the British term better, but rimmer sounds too much like an erotic toy for Americans to widely accept the term.] Boulton's rimmer did five things: removed the burrs, smoothes the edge, rounds the edge, made the blanks perfectly round, and thicken the edge. Modern upsetting machines still do these five things. Mint error collectors call blanks before upsetting "type 1" after upsetting "type 2." Type 1 blanks are fed into an upsetting machine and they travel in a channel on a spiral track through ever smaller and smaller walls which forces the blank's diameter to become less and less. The metal at the edge builds up on both surfaces, thus making the blank thicker around the circumference (ideal for raised rim coins!). To answer your second question, Chris, who else uses upsetting machines? I live near the Naugutuck Valley of Connecticut where machine shops and metalworking plants are on every block in every industrial area. I should ask some of these. But the obvious answers are anything that is "coined," that is stuck between dies at room temperature: Buttons, small parts, washers, rings, the list is lengthy. Some odd shaped parts are coined from round blanks because of the ease and speed of striking these, then trimmed to shape afterwards. I learned of the upsetting machine close up when Medallic Art Company bought its first coining press in 1967. We bought the press in Germany, but upsetting machines are made in England (okay, rimmers!) and we couldn't get one right away. My boss, Bill Louth, happened to mention this to Eva Adams, then Director of the U.S. Mint. "We got some we're not using," she said, "I'll lend you one." Sure enough, until a new one came from England, we used a U.S. Mint upsetting machine for upsetting blanks to strike medals! The first of these were the Illinois Sesquicentennial Medal of 1968 in silver dollar size." Wayne Homren, Editor The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org. To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor at this address: whomren@coinlibrary.com To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum | |
PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V7 2004 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE