Tony Lopez published an article in the December 2013 issue of the MCA Advisory (a publication of the Medal Collectors of America) asking whether historical medals should be encapsulated by grading and certification services.
In it he provided multiple examples of inaccurate, confusing, misleading or just plain wrong descriptions and attributions of medals slabbed by the services. He also makes a strong case against the authenticity of a medal declared authentic by one of the services.
Here's a short excerpt from his article's conclusion.
-Editor
Research on medals,
compared to research on coins, is
in its infancy. The grading
companies neither have, nor is it
possible for them to have, the
level of expertise across the
board for historical medals that they can offer for coins.
In order to meet the same standards used in
grading and authenticating coins, the duty of the grading
companies to competently and accurately encapsulate
medals requires them to have expertise in authenticating
and grading well over a thousand different medals of
different designs, compositions, and manufacturing
processes, manufactured over a period of nearly 500
years. For now they can accomplish this using only a
few scattered references (Betts is over 100 years old and
seriously outdated), and with no grading standards in
existence. Only one word comes to mind: “Impossible”.
With historical medals, there are no
published grading standards and no grading sets, so it is
impossible for the grading services to meet the same
grading standards they use for coins As said earlier,
between all of the categories of historical medals they
include in their services, there are thousands of designs
and even more varieties. With no standards, limited
references, and minimal experience and expertise with
an overwhelming number of different types and designs
of medals spanning many centuries, it is not possible for
them to meet the same standards for grading historical
medals that they use for coins.
My solemn advice to medal collectors is to free
your “graded” medals from their slabs so that you can
“feel” the history. Save your money on third party
authentication and grading. And, when deciding what to
bid, or whether to buy, ignore everything written on the
plastic.
In the issue editor John W. Adams writes:
This issue features a landmark article by Tony
Lopez. The piece provides fascinating insights into
Tony’s authentication techniques, but its special
importance derives from its discussion of the role of
grading services in the collecting of historical medals.
The author firmly rejects the idea of encapsulation on
general principles, with which most readers would agree.
The more courageous point he makes is that, unlike the
situation with coins, the grading services do not have the
expertise either to grade or to authenticate. He makes his
case with a series of examples that NGC and PCGS
would find difficult to refute. Given that medals
represent virgin territory for the grading services, it will
be difficult to keep them out unless more collectors
emulate Tony’s example of trashing the plastic.
Tony adds:
You will see in the next issue of the MCA Advisory the record-breaking amount of correspondence and discussion that has followed the article. I am pleased the subject matter struck an important chord in the hobby. Hopefully something positive will come of it.
I'm not surprised the article hit a nerve. It will be interesting to see how this plays out. While it's hard to expect even the best third-party experts to be truly expert in everything, it's equally distressing to see so many mistakes. There's no shame in admitting that you don't have the answer, and I wouldn't advocate that the services refund their fees in such a case. There's a limit to what one should expect for a $35 consulting fee, but it is fair to expect some consistency and predictability in attributions, and an honest "Sorry, we don't know either" response when appropriate.
-Editor
To learn more about the Medal Collectors of America, see:
www.medalcollectors.org
Wayne Homren, Editor
The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization
promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org.
To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor
at this address: whomren@gmail.com
To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum
Copyright © 1998 - 2024 The Numismatic Bibliomania Society (NBS)
All Rights Reserved.
NBS Home Page
Contact the NBS webmaster
|