As mentioned in last week's Numismatic Diary, here is Part I of Steve Bishop's submission on identifying undertypes in
overstruck Russian copper coins. Thanks, Steve. -Editor
IDENTIFYING UNDERTYPES IN OVERSTRUCK RUSSIAN COPPER COINS
By Steve Bishop
It’s gratifying to be able to pass on specialized knowledge to other collectors in an area that those collectors may not be familiar. In this
case, a question from Wayne Homren at our recent Nummis Nova dinner sparked this article.
I have a specialty collection of overstruck copper coins of 18th century Russia. I have written on this topic before in the E-Sylum, notably on
the reoverstriking program of Tsar Paul I in 1797. In that article, I touched on identifying coins from that program and the undertype coins that
they were struck from. In this article, I will cover identifying the undertypes of the overstruck copper coins of Russia in general.
I. Copper Coins of Catherine the Great (1762-96) Struck Over Coins of 1762
The two coins that instigated my conversation with Wayne are pictured below.
1788 MM 2 Kopeks struck over 1762 4 Kopecks
1788 MM 5 Kopecks struck over 1762 10 kopecks
The question that Wayne asked about these two pieces was logical. How did I know that these coins were struck over the coins that I claimed they
were, since he could not see any trace of the date 1762 in the undertype?
It is a truism in overstrike collecting that the exact date of the undertype is not identifiable in many instances because the overstrike
obliterates the old date. Thus, it is often the case that only the general type and a date range are identifiable. In this case, I know that the
coins were struck over 1762 coins for two reasons. First, this particular date and mint combination are very commonly found struck over 1762 coins.
The 1762 coins were overstruck by Catherine the Great because Peter III, who ruled briefly in 1762, had changed the monetary standard so that the
value of the copper coins were doubled by halving the amount of copper. That is, the value of one ruble of copper was deemed now to be worth two
rubles. One kopeck became two kopecks, two kopecks became four, etc.
Catherine changed the monetary standard back to what it had been previously. Although two kopeck and five kopeck pieces of Catherine are sometimes
found struck over two and five kopecks of Elizabeth, most of them were struck over the 1762 issue to prevent coins of the same weight but different
denominations from circulating concurrently. This is the primary reason that the copper coins of Peter are so scarce. Secondly, Peter’s coins had a
distinctive design, so by seeing the traces of his designs on an overstruck piece, no signs of the date are necessary to identify the date of the
undertype, since his coins were struck only in 1762.
The most obvious design device usually seen on an overstruck 1762 piece is the denomination inscription. Sometime the “4”, which is a denomination
peculiar to 1762, may be seen, as in the coin pictured below.
1766 CΠB 2 Kopecks overstruck on 1762 4 Kopecks
In this case, the “4” would be the only thing that identifies the undertype, if not for the traces of the horse and rider and stars on the
reverse, and would be more than sufficient. The two kopeck piece pictured at the beginning of this article does not show the “4”, but the rest of the
denomination inscription is clearly seen. The five kopeck piece pictured above shows clearly both the “10” and the rest of the denomination
inscription.
Even a small amount of the denomination inscription is sufficient to identify the undertype in some cases. The five kopeck piece pictured below
shows only a fraction of the denomination inscription (to the left of the eagle), but that is enough.
1763 MM 5 Kopecks Struck Over 1762 10 Kopecks
As noted above, sometimes the smallest design element is sufficient to identify the undertype. One of the distinctive elements of the 1762 designs
is a circle of stars around the perimeter, the number of stars reflecting the denomination. In the five kopeck piece pictured below, many of the
stars are visible, which makes it easy to identify the undertype, even though none of the other 1762 design elements, other than a portion of the
eagle’s wing within the stars and the “10” on the obverse, may be seen. Indeed, even the appearance of a single star would be sufficient.
1788 CΠB 5 Kopecks struck over 1762 10 kopecks
For the convenience of the reader, four and ten kopeck pieces of 1762 are shown below so that all of the distinctive design elements may be
seen.
1762 4 Kopecks
1762 10 Kopecks
See next week's issue for Part II. -Editor
To read the earlier E-Sylum article, see:
WAYNE'S NUMISMATIC DIARY: NOVEMBER 20, 2016 : Overstruck Russian Coppers
(www.coinbooks.org/esylum_v19n47a20.html)
THE 1797 RECOINING PROGRAM OF CZAR PAUL I OF RUSSIA
(www.coinbooks.org/esylum_v19n08a30.html)
Wayne Homren, Editor
The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization
promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org.
To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor
at this address: whomren@gmail.com
To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum
Copyright © 1998 - 2024 The Numismatic Bibliomania Society (NBS)
All Rights Reserved.
NBS Home Page
Contact the NBS webmaster
|