PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V4 2001 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE
The E-Sylum: Volume 4, Number 18, April 29, 2001, Article 11
IN DEFENSE OF MICROFILM
Granvyl G. Hulse, Jr., Librarian, Numismatics International
writes: "I am going to have to come to the defense of
microfilming, but I do so with some reluctance, and not for
obvious reasons. I have had to do newspaper research a
number of times in my life. The first that made the greatest
impression on me was when I started my series on medals
awarded to British soldiers during the American Revolution
for ANA's The Numismatist.
My first research was on the Battle of Germantown. I was
in London at the time and received permission to enter the
North Reading Room of the British Museum to look through
their newspaper collection. I was thrilled, yet somewhat
appalled. They placed in my hands bound originals almost
two hundred years old. I turned the pages with great care.
Found what I wanted and departed.
In looking back over that adventure my though was - what
if others did not turn the pages with the same care and
reverence that I did and they were damaged; and, secondly,
how could anyone not living in London ever see the march
of history that I was able to? Not being on microfilm they
would be un-available to anyone else outside of England.
The second research effort occurred just recently, and I only
had to go back to the early 20's. Our weekly newspaper
suffered a fire about 40 years ago and all of their bound
copies were destroyed. Happily for my research, copies of
the paper had been sent to Concord. If it were not for their
being microfilmed, the copies in Concord would never have
been seen by me, or anyone else, as the paper used was such
a poor grade that the library had to handle the pages like the
Dead Sea Scrolls to get them filmed. If they had not been
microfilmed I would never have been able to see them, and
thus would not have found the information I was looking for.
I hate reading microfilm with a passion, and am living for the
day when the material will be transferred to CD disk for sale
to the public. But the advantage of microfilm, as any genealogist
who uses the Mormon libraries will tell you, is that writings and
records are readily available to anyone.
We can criticize the method used to microfilm, but we cannot
discount its advantage. I would have to buy another fifteen
room house for storage space alone if I were to maintain hard
bound copies of the references I have needed for my research,
and supposing I had the only copy. Like the Mona Lisa locked
away in some private vault to be viewed by only the owner, it
would do the rest of the world no good at all."
Hulse adds: "After I had sent my earlier commentary on
microfilming I looked over the sale of Ran Zander's library.
The third paragraph stood out, and supports my earlier view
of the importance of microfilming:
WORLD-WIDE COINS OF CALIFORNIA
JAMES F. ELMEN Presents
THE RUSSIAN NUMISMATIC LIBRARY OF
RANDOLPH ZANDER
A MAIL BID SALE AND REFERENCE CATALOG
Closing Date: 17 May 2001
For reading purposes, Ran found high quality bound xerox
copies to be most useful, as their use eliminates the fear of
damaging a rare and frequently fragile original text. This
offering contains many of his "self-published" perfect bound
reprints, most of which are virtually unobtainable as originals.
Many of the volumes in the library contain Ran's book stamp,
marginal notations and written dedications from the authors.
Lots should be presumed to be used but in solid serviceable
condition unless otherwise indicated in the description. Many
of the items are in the Russian language and are indicated as
such by have the title written first in Russian followed by an
English translation"
Wayne Homren, Editor
The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization
promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org.
To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor
at this address: whomren@coinlibrary.com
To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum
|