PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V5 2002 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE
The E-Sylum: Volume 5, Number 46, November 17, 2002, Article 15 MUSEUM / COLLECTOR DEBATE RAGES So much for "last words". The museum/collector discussion continues, this time with several jabs at curators who misappropriate artifacts (or allow misappropriation to happen through indifference or incompetence). Present company excepted, naturally. While the instances cited are unfortunate, I believe they are intended as examples of what can happen, and certainly do not apply to all museums. Ed Krivoniak writes: "It's about time that someone spoke out against museums and archaeologists. I have very little respect left for either. It has become a practice over the last few years for museums, libraries and historical societies to sell off their coin collections to pay for other acquisitions. The Carnegie Museum of Pittsburgh is a case in point. Not only did they sell the collection but they did it poorly. Look back through your auction catalogs to find many other culprits. As far as the archeologists are concerned, I know of 2 accumulations that have been sold in Pittsburgh in the last 10 years where the items came from archaeologists. The first was a collection of Egyptian relics including a mummified cat and the second was a collection of late medieval to early modern Islamic coins. One group came from a retiring archaeologist and the other from the estate of an archaeologist. Personally I once sold a book about General Sherman's march written by his aide decamp. Where did I find it? In the garbage in front of the Monessen Public Library! At least the relic or coin hunter is honest in trying to locate these items for a profit and not like the museums and archaeologists who betray the public's trust." [Although Ed's implication is that the items in the archaeologists' collections were misappropriated property, there is of course no way to know that. The items could have been acquired quite legitimately. As for the Carnegie coin sales, I can attest to how poorly the sales were handled. The encased postage stamps, which may have come from the collection of local collector Earl Coatsworth, were auctioned in London. It's hard enough to find collectors of these rare items here in the states, but retail bidders were nonexistent in London. Through a dealer who attended the sale, I purchased a rare Ellis McAlpin 5 cent for a mere 95 dollars. It's an R9 worth in excess of $1,000. I assume my dealer friend bought most or all of the rest of the encased pieces at similar bargain prices. The museum is currently in financial straits and had to lay off three curators. -Editor] Dave Bowers writes: "Concerning public museums with coins, it has been my very long term experience and observation that if a museum has a NUMISMATICALLY KNOWLEDGEABLE curator who is also honest (which is usually the case), all is well, and the collection can flourish and be an asset to the public as well as to numismatists. However, if there is an interregnum in which there is not a NUMISMATICALLY KNOWLEDGEABLE curator, then there may be a problem, as things tend to "walk." A number of years ago our company received a nice letter from a state university, enclosing an inventory of its coin collection compiled years earlier. On the list were many rare and important pieces. The collection was long sealed in a vault and had not been inspected in recent times. A representative of my company hopped on a plane, met with the university official in charge, and together they went to the vault for an inspection. When the vault was opened there was JUST ONE COIN remaining, a 1922 Peace silver dollar! I could relate MANY more such stories. In case it might be relevant, the same situation occurs with other "collectibles" that are kept by museums, if the curators are not knowledgeable in that particular area. I am interested in meteorites and a few years ago my wife and I donated a nice collection of these to Harvard University (their most important acquisition in this field since 1882), the minerals and meteorites being well curated by Dr. Carl Francis and Bill Metropolis, both prominent in their fields and both personal friends. They, too, have "stories" to share about minerals and meteorites ONCE (but no longer) in various museum collections without experts in this field--the meteorites and minerals "walked." Similarly, any member of the Manuscript Society (of which I have been a member since 1958) knows the many dozens of stories about autographs, signatures, etc., once in public libraries and museums, but not carefully curated, that have "walked." Indeed, almost every issue of the Manuscript Society Newsletter has a new story in this regard. Recently I visited a prominent public library and found in file folders over $100,000 in historical obsolete currency. I paid for Xerox copies of each note (to record the serial numbers) and suggested to the curator that these, if discovered by someone with less than honest motives, might "walk." He said he would make his own set of Xerox copies and put the originals in the library's vault. In summary, for a museum to have a successful numismatic holding of great importance, and to hold it, this should take place: The coins should be attributed, photographed (easy enough to do electronically these days), and an inventory should be made of them. There should be sensible precautions regarding those who have access to the specimens. The curator in charge should have basic numismatic knowledge, or take steps to secure same, or should enlist the services of an independent consultant or friend of the museum in this regard." Wayne Homren, Editor The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org. To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor at this address: whomren@coinlibrary.com To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum | |
PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V5 2002 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE