PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V8 2005 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE
The E-Sylum: Volume 8, Number 7, February 13, 2005, Article 22 HOW SOON TO REVISE BRITISH EMPIRE COINS? Dick Johnson writes: "Periodically, someone wants to do away with the Royal Family of Britain. Mostly its Brits themselves. One out of three Englishmen are no longer loyal to the Royals. This one act alone would effect the images on coins of Australia, Canada, New Zealand (and a dozen other dominions and colonies) in addition to England itself. Royal Family images appear on paper money and stamps, as well. Prince Charles impending marriage to Camilla Parker Bowles won#39;t change much. "Has the time for royalty passed?" asked writer Doug Casey, February 8, 2005 in the International Speculator. Does England really want to abolish the monarchy? He lists the actions of the dysfunctional current Royal Family but states firmly that as long as Queen Elizabeth rules Britannia there will be no more talk of that. It costs British taxpayers approximately 37 million pounds (almost $70 million) each year to keep the monarchy but the citizens are, apparently, still willing to pay this for the "pomp and circumstance" the Royal Family provides. But imagine what British coins would look like without a king or queen#39;s physiognomy? The country has a rich heritage of symbols, from Big Ben to country castles. It also has not one, but two medallic sculptor organizations in the wings whose members are fully capable to create new coin designs. Doug Casey#39;s article "Loyal To The Royals": Full Story [Thanks for pointing out this article, Dick. Here are some excerpts. -Editor] "Throughout history, kings and queens have ruled over Britain. With a national anthem of ‘God Save the Queen#39; and the monarch-of-the-day#39;s face emblazoned on every British pound note and coin, British heritage is steeped in this time-honored tradition of the Royal Family. However, the world—and many Britons—periodically wonder: Has the time for royalty passed? In a country built on so-called ‘pomp and circumstance,#39; admittedly, the Royal Family fits in perfectly. With a cast of colorful characters that any TV soap opera would take pride in, it is no wonder that the Windsors are a favorite of international tabloid paparazzi who revel in every detail of fairy tale marriages and high-file divorces, tragic deaths and rumors about homosexuality. Every milestone and misstep by the blue-bloods has been well publicized and sold millions of newspapers." "Of course, older generations of Britons, who served ‘Queen and country,#39; have always shown strong support for this institution. "When I was a boy, loyalty to the Crown was a big thing. Now you don#39;t hear so much about it," Sir William Broun of Colstoum, a 13th-generation baronet, told The Guardian. Nevertheless, more and more British people seem to feel disloyal to the Royals. A 1999 poll in The Sun found that 1 in 3 Brits (up from 1 in 4 in 1996) said they would vote to abolish the monarchy if there was a public referendum." "So, why are the Royals still treated so royally? Maybe the Brits are able to forgive and forget because they take the Royals for what they are—an eccentric, antiquated and out-of-touch family who nostalgically represents centuries of tradition. Of course, as long as the Queen is still alive and kicking, the throne will be safe from blunder-prone successors. After that, we#39;ll just have to see." Wayne Homren, Editor The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org. To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor at this address: whomren@coinlibrary.com To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum | |
PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V8 2005 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE