PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V8 2005 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE
The E-Sylum: Volume 8, Number 54, December 25, 2005, Article 16 BRIBERY ALLEGED IN GEM GRADING: IS COIN GRADING VULNERABLE? An article in the December 20 Wall Street Journal discusses a recent scandal involving independent graders of gemstones. How good are the checks and balances at the top numismatic grading services? Could such a scandal befall ever the coin grading industry? We all hear the constant complaints about the services, but I've never heard a whiff of such shenanigans in our field. "Bribery allegations at the nation's top rater of diamonds are rocking the jewelry business and tarnishing trust in the system for valuing gems. The Gemological Institute of America, which grades diamonds for independent dealers and big retailers such as Tiffany & Co. and Bailey Banks & Biddle, recently fired four employees and shuffled top management after a four-month internal probe of its policies. The institute also is in talks to settle a lawsuit filed last spring by a diamond dealer accusing workers in its New York laboratory of taking bribes to inflate the quality of diamonds in grading reports, said people familiar with the situation. The institute's grading system is relied upon by most dealers and retailers in determining the worth of diamonds. Since the quality of gemstones is impossible for a layperson to evaluate, independent labs like the Gemological Institute are vital in determining a diamond's worth." Wayne Homren, Editor The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org. To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor at this address: whomren@coinlibrary.com To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum | |
PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V8 2005 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE