PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V9 2006 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE
The E-Sylum: Volume 9, Number 18, April 30, 2006, Article 10 COIN PORTRAITS OF THE QUEEN Regarding the Queen's portrait on various nations' coins and banknotes, Martin Purdy writes: "I guess they must have some freedom - NZ had a "unique" (and not very successful) portrait of the Queen by James Berry on its NCLT dollar coins from 1979 to 1981, before reverting to the Machin portrait. The dates of changeover from one portrait to another are not standardised, either. The Machin portrait was introduced on some "colonial" coinage before the UK itself made the switch away from the Gillick portrait. The UK adopted the Machin version in 1968/71, while Machin was adopted in Rhodesia as early as 1964 (I'm quoting from memory, I think it was the first), Canada in 1965, Australia in 1966 and New Zealand in 1967. Likewise, changes to later portraits have been staggered from country to country." Charlie Hosch writes: "As for Maundy money, traditionally the monarch's portrait on the obverse is never changed throughout the reign. They are not "circulating currency," so who really cares? Maundy money is quite rare, but not collected by a significant number of numismatists, and therefore the retail prices are quite low compared to the mintage. As for different images used by various British Commonwealth countries that do not "conform" to the UK image -- well, they (the Commonwealth countries) can do anything they want to do. It's not like the Queen can have their heads cut off if she doesn't approve. Of course she will approve whatever a mint puts in front of her. Is she going to cause a "stink" because she has a minor problem with the design? Not hardly. I'm sure Her Majesty has other fish to fry." Kerry Rodgers writes: "Gary Dunaier queries the use on coins of different EFFIGIES (NOT portraits) of Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith. The Queen may be Head of the Commonwealth, Supreme Governor of the Church of England, Lord of Mann and the Duke of Lancaster, but is also Queen of at least sixteen independent nations known as the Commonwealth Realms, consisting of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Jamaica, Barbados, Bahamas, Grenada, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Antigua and Barbuda, Belize, and Saint Kitts and Nevis. The key word is "independent". By the Statute of Westminster 1931 she holds these positions equally; no one nation takes precedence over any other. As such there is and never has been a "home office" since 1931, except where and when any of these countries were colonies. All are now independent. As such, each of these realms can do what it wishes with their own queen's effigy, although the approval of HRH is sought as to how she is depicted. New Zealand did it own thing back in 1979-82 with a distinctive effigy of the Queen of New Zealand. Canada has its own effigy of the Queen of Canada. I spoke to one mint about their use of the Maklouf effigy vs the Rank-Broadley version and they said it depended on cost, convenience and usage of the particular realm. Consequently, while the IRB version may be "current" in one of Her Majesty's realms it may well not be in another. The situation is no different than it is with bank notes or stamps. I may be doing Gary an injustice but I presume he is from one republic or another - or is an Australian! I used to struggle to explain to such folk that Elizabeth is Queen of New Zealand quite independently of being Queen of England. These days I usually don't bother - particularly with confused Australians. Intriguingly, I have found the California numismatists I know have no problem with the concept. Many of them had it sorted out long before I hove into view. They point out that a number of countries use the currency of another with which they are not politically connected. For example, Tuvalu uses Australian dollars. Consequently, having a Head of State who doesn't live in your neck of the woods is no big deal. I had always understood it was Bostonians who were the politically savvy folk in the U.S. I now know it is the Californians - which may explain a lot!" Wayne Homren, Editor The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org. To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor at this address: whomren@coinlibrary.com To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum | |
PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V9 2006 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE