PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V9 2006 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE
The E-Sylum: Volume 9, Number 32, August 6, 2006, Article 9 ON BRITTLE, POROUS GOLD Dick Johnson writes: "I blew it - I gave an incorrect answer to Dick Hanscomb two weeks back in The E-Sylum (vol 9, no 29, article 23). Dick was having trouble rolling gold. I (mistakenly) thought this could be solved like other coinage metals (silver, copper, bronze) with heat treating and I wrote a couple paragraphs about the lack of collector knowledge of this important coinage technology (this part was true). I admitted up front in my remarks that working with gold was not my strong suit. When I worked for a medal company and we had orders to make gold medals we purchased the gold blanks from suppliers (who knew our needs and were sure to supply the most suitable gold for fabrication). We were not using native gold like Dick Hanscomb was working with. The advantage of putting an item in E-Sylum is the immediate feedback. In addition to an apology to E-Sylum readers, I would like to thank Ken Douglas and Peter Gaspar for their insightful (and correct) responses in regards to the purity of the gold (in last week's E-Sylum). It was the impurities in the gold not the hardness that was causing Dick Hanscomb's problems. Truth will always come out in E-Sylum! After all, there are almost a thousand of the most knowledgeable critics in the world reading these words. Someone is bound to spot the most innocuous error." [It's interesting to note that the two respondents (Peter Gaspar and Ken Douglas) were the first and the most recent subscribers to The E-Sylum, respectively. This only goes to further Dick's point about the collective knowledge of The E-Sylum's readership. It's what I'd hoped to unlock with the power of the Internet, and it's proved true again and again. The real power of this forum is not the newsletter itself, it's the readership. -Editor] Dick Hanscom of Fairbanks, Alaska writes: "I'm happy to report that I have made the gold from the Forty Mile usable (I had gold from Nome and Forty Mile that turned brittle and porous). A friend provided a flux consisting of silica, borax, sodium nitrate and sodium bicarbonate. It took two melts and pours (melting the gold and pouring it into an ingot mold) to cure the problem. After the first pour, there was some coppery looking material at the top (sort of a tail going down into the mold). After removing this, the gold was melted again, and the result was satisfactory. I was able to roll the gold to .6mm required for my 1 DWT tokens. I melted the gold (the scrap after punching out the blanks) two more times and it continued to be solid. Concerning the Nome gold: I will contact the miner and give him some of this flux to try on his gold. I want to thank all readers who provided suggestions concerning this problem. I passed all of this on to my friend who gave me the flux. I suspect that there was enough information there to give him some insight. Either that or the simple fact that I melted this gold at least a half dozen times and it just decided to cooperate! I would also like to thank those that have provided information about die engraving. This will probably be a winter project for me, and I know just enough to be dangerous. Worse comes to worse, I destroy some steel, and then pay some one to cut my die." Wayne Homren, Editor The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org. To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor at this address: whomren@coinlibrary.com To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum | |
PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V9 2006 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE