PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V9 2006 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE
The E-Sylum: Volume 9, Number 37, September 10, 2006, Article 15 MORE THOUGHTS ON AGE AND VALUE Bill Rosenblum writes: "A couple of thoughts about the age of a coin not having anything to do with the value. 1) I always have a huge supply of low grade Roman bronzes from the 3rd and 4th Century which can be purchased for as low as $2 if one buys enough of them at my bourse tables. This usually helps convince people that the "old coin" they have is not valuable just because it's old. 2) What constitutes an old coin may depend on the age of the person who has the coin. Back around 1980 I received a phone call from someone who sounded no older than 10. He told me he had "a real old coin" and wanted to know how much it was worth. I always tell people I have to see the coin first and when they become insistent I would tell them to "hold it closer to the phone". (Of course now people can do that, although I would not have any idea how to see it). But since this was a kid I thought I would try to help him. What he had, was an early 1960's Lincoln cent. But to an 8 to 10 year old, that was "real old"." Wayne Homren, Editor The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org. To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor at this address: whomren@coinlibrary.com To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum | |
PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V9 2006 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE