The British Museum has a Good Samaritan silver shilling in their cabinet that grades Fair - About Good condition - smooth clean wear, no damage - so someone went to a lot of trouble to make this "fabrication" look legitimate. I believe the pedigree is the Pembroke Collection going back to the early 1800's.

Years ago a decent publisher would have supplied the purchasers of the book with an addendum free of charge for the missing sections (especially with such major sections missing). By requiring the purchaser to download files, the publisher saves the expense of printing and mailing the missing sections and instead shifts the burden (& the expense) to the purchaser. It may have been a true error on the publisher's part but I can see it becoming more & more common since it saves the publisher money in the long run.

Thian's name is misspelled twice in the Wilsons' review (first two instances - Thain). Their reference to the AGO as the Attorney General's Office should be Adjutant General's Office. You might want to fix those in your archive.

The Crusader gold pieces - should they be DINARS and parts? They are called both dinaR and dinaL in the press report - mis-print maybe. (Dinal certainly isn't in Frey - who I trust).

Here is a beautiful illustration of a posing stand, but they have the head clamp turned on end (vertical) rather than in the position of use, grasping a subject's head behind the ears.