Harvey G . Stack submitted the following thoughts on John
Ford, Paul Franklin and the franklin Hoard. Thanks.
-Editor
I enjoyed last week's E-Sylum and the item about John
Ford and Paul Franklin.
It was surprising to me , though it was reported earlier, discussed
widely for almost 50 years, that the ANA hearing, and testimony
received by such as Painter, Merkin and others, in which Ford
presented a huge explanation of what he discovered about the
series of the Early Assay office pieces in Proof, and the fact
that the elite committee who heard the case, could not decide
if the coins were genuine, were they counterfeited by someone
or was it a discovery that has been dammed.
The case I refer to is the Garland charges that the ANA conducted the hearing
for. They finally determined that the Garland Coin, (the one which
was the subject of the hearing, was not a 'PROOF' nor a 'SPECIMEN
STRIKING" but left the subject of Genuineness UNANSWERED.
The same group of critics who was downing the Assay office pieces,
also took shots on items that were not in the Guidebook, or were in,
and then removed, and then accused the same perpetrators of
making or fabricating these.
To the best of my knowledge, when
these were first marketed, they were checked for alloy and composition
to be correctly stated as to what they were in quality or fineness.
The tests, which I saw, but do not have in my files, were done by
several elite metallurgical laboratories at the time, which included but
not limited to the Dupont Laboratory, MIT laboratory, and the
U.S . Office of Weights and Measures, and the Department of
Minerals .
All felt that the items were if the fineness , quality and
had the characteristics of the area the gold was mined or was
later assayed and stamped on the pieces.
If one is to argue the case, the early Ford presentation, numbering
hundreds of pages, (as I remember it ) was not included in the
rebuttal, but from what I read John Kleeberg did not do a full
condemnation of the pieces, and spent a lot of time on the Mexican
bars.
In my opinion , a report as detailed as this book, should have given
the Ford information, which was argued , refuted but never determined to be incorrect when discussed in the 1960s, when
John was alive and able to explain and refute some of conjectures
found in his REPORT AND TESTIMONY.
In my opinion, the book with all its documentation reproduced was
an attempt to vindicate Paul Franklin, who was well known to me
as an associate of John Ford, in the sense of seeking info for John,
and a poor attempt to pin "all foul play" on John.
If John was alive
today, I feel he could have and would have refuted or logically
explained what the "letters" said (both his and Paul's) and the poor
case the opposition prepared against both in the early 1960's and
still simmers in today's literature.
For those who would like to know, Werner Amelingminer, was a friend of John Ford, who collected somewhat, but was generous, though shared with John some of the deals that Werner
helped John finance . I feel some credit for care and deep numismatic
study and examination should be given to some of the alleged clients
for the questionable coins and bars, i.e. Wayte Raymond, F.C.C. Boyd
Mrs. Norweb, Stack's and the curators of the Smithsonian, who would
have had the skill to question , study and determine the origin of these
numismatic items.
Fred Werner, was an active Long Island Dealer, and sometimes got
coins from John to sell to his clients, take some to shows to try to
"make a buck" and was a somewhat well rounded numismatist in
his own right. We had many smaller numismatists who made a living
from getting merchandise from one source and selling it to another
during the 1950's through the present day, in the New York Area.
The reviews you published were good for the matter to be reviewed
by skeptics and put to rest.
I respect the Harry Riesenberg use of the Mexican items to glorify
and make a movie, but is that a source of argument or imagination?
To read the earlier E-Sylum article, see:
BOOK REVIEW: JOHN J. FORD AND THE FRANKLIN HOARD
(www.coinbooks.org/esylum_v16n26a07.html)
THE BOOK BAZARRE
Looking for the latest Official Red Book? Go here to shop for
coin books .
Wayne Homren, Editor
The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization
promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org.
To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor
at this address: whomren@gmail.com
To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum
Copyright © 1998 - 2024 The Numismatic Bibliomania Society (NBS)
All Rights Reserved.
NBS Home Page
Contact the NBS webmaster
|