Coin Update has an article about possible
new designs for the reverse of the U.S. Mint's American
Silver Eagle bullion coins. Pictured is the one the committee
gave its support to. -Editor
During a
teleconference meeting held on April 8th, 2014, the Citizens
Coinage Advisory Committee reviewed and discussed 44 possible
reverse designs for the American Silver Eagle bullion and proof
coins, pulled together from other programs. In attendance were
Chairman Gary Marks, Dr. Michael Bugeja, Robert Hoge, Erik
Jansen, Mike Moran, Michael Olson, Donald Scarinci, Jeanne
Stevens-Sollman, Thomas Uram, and Heidi Wastweet, as well as
members of the U.S. Mint staff and members of the press.
Dr. Michael Bugeja started the design comments with a
retrospective of eagles and their use in coins in general, and in
these designs in particular. He noted there are four types of
eagles: stylized, personified, symbolic, and natural; in his
opinion, only the symbolic type was appropriate for use on coins.
Six of the members had indicated a preference for design 40, and
eight had preferred design 41.
Michael Olson started his comments with a reminder that this
coin is a flagship for the country. He would prefer more emphasis
on the eagle over the shield. He was not inclined to reuse older
designs. He indicated he would give his full support to design
41. He floated the idea of a redesign of the American Gold Eagle,
much like the committee was currently discussing the American
Silver Eagle. Chairman Marks replied that it was a possibility,
just not being discussed at this time.
Heidi Wastweet noted she would want to see variations on
design 41, giving the Mint artists some "breathing room". She
also wanted to see arrows added to the existing olive branch,
following the classic combination of peace with the threat to
protect that peace. She said that she would want the American
Silver Eagle "to be distinct" from any other coins (design 40 is
currently up for approval by the Treasury Secretary for the 2015
US Marshals Commemorative $5 Gold Coin).
Donald Scarinci was wide-ranging in his comments. He gave an
honorable mention to design 4, noting that the circular pattern
invokes motion. He thought design 15 was "nice", but while he
noted there were issues with the wings, he said it had
"beautiful, clean fields" and a focus on the eagle over the other
features. He said the eagle on design 22 was "gorgeous", noting
it embraces the coin. He did not like design 40 for this coin in
general, but also thought there was "too much happening." He
closed his comments with a plea: "Can we just have an eagle?"
Erik Jansen indicated his preference to "action over pose",
and encouraged his colleagues to vote for a series of
preferences, rather than a single design. He said he would be
"really really really let down" if the new design resulted in the
"bird-feather equivalent of spaghetti hair". He asked the Mint to
"sculpt detail, and not Photoshop this sculpt." He made a point
of stating he was not in favor of design 41, noting the
unrealistic depiction of the olive branch in the wind. His backup
was design 24, but wanted to make sure it showed feathers and not
scales. He also called out design 19 as an "interesting design,"
depicting two eagles over one. He liked design 44, but felt it
wasn’t the right design for this coin.
Thomas Uram was the last to comment, and started with asking,
"What is the upside of changing an already-successful design?" He
was leaning strongly towards only changing the proof coin rather
than it and the bullion coin. He mentioned that the 30th
anniversary of the coin is coming up in 2016: a natural time to
make a change, perhaps in a high relief specimen. He was not sure
he was on the "design 41 train". His top pick was design 22, but
it needs "LIBERTY" removed and the eagle strengthened. He closed
his comments with a warning not to mess with "the best bullion
coin that’s out in the world."
Some great comments all around. See the full
article for the complete set of designs and committee discussion.
-Editor
To read the complete article, see:
CCAC Discusses Potential Silver Eagle Reverse Designs
(news.coinupdate.com/ccac-discusses-potential-silver-eagle-reverse-designs-3231/)
Wayne Homren, Editor
The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization
promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org.
To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor
at this address: whomren@gmail.com
To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum
Copyright © 1998 - 2024 The Numismatic Bibliomania Society (NBS)
All Rights Reserved.
NBS Home Page
Contact the NBS webmaster
|