Last week David Pickup asked for assistance identifying a Roman Provincial coin that had some members of the Oxford Numismatic
Society stumped. Here's what readers thought. -Editor
Javier Arce, Prof. Emeritus Roman Archaeology, University Lille3 (France) writes:
In my opinion, it is clearly a labarum and therefore, the coin should be Constantinian (after 313 AD). In the portrait, we can see also the
diadem, that is clearly also Constantinian. The mention of the Legio Tertia is not so unusual in some issues in bronze in the period.
On our Flickr photo archive, Stuart writes:
The most detailed reply came from Mark Fox of Michigan. Thanks! -Editor
Aren't Roman provincials fascinating? I didn't quite expect to be making a contribution of this nature for The E-Sylum, but here it
The bronze in question is an issue of Rhesaena (today's Ra's al-'Ayn, Syria) in the Roman province of Mesopotamia (part of modern
Iraq, Syria, and other countries), struck for the emperor Caracalla (AD 198–217). The Roman provincial coinage of Rhesaena contains some of the
crudest coins struck under the Romans that I have ever seen, especially those minted during the reign of Caracalla's numismatic twin, Elagabalus
(AD 218–222). Engravers aglow with talent by comparison were responsible for cutting most of the dies under later emperors, particularly Trajan
David's coin is in remarkably good condition with a clear reverse and good centering on both sides, despite the irregular flan. The reverse
appears to read "LEG III / P S," probably referring to Legio III Parthica, the Roman legion that was stationed at Rhesaena.
Here is a similar example with the letter 'Γ' on the vexillum.
The legends might also differ slightly in their content. They are almost always hard to read on the early coins, even on the best preserved
For the star-on-vexillum variety (as in David's example), we have these two specimens in the online BnF database:
They illustrate the carelessness and/or inexperience of both engraver and minter, and the difficulty of interpreting these coins because of these
problems. The reverse of the second coin, for instance, is pictured upside down!
For a wider view of the coinage, I recommend having a peek at the Rhesaena web page on Wildwinds:
I think the principal reference on this city's coins is still The Coinage of Rhesaena
in Mesopotamia (1946), by Karel O. Castelin (ANS NNM #108). I was quite surprised during my research of David's coin to have found a
digitized copy of Castelin's work online, courtesy of HathiTrust!
If someone needs help, I probably could dig up a catalog reference from this monograph for David's coin, or at least the listed type that it
most closely resembles. Hope this helps.
David Pickup writes:
Please pass on my thanks to Mark for this. I appreciate the work he has put into this. I certainly found it a challenging coin! I agree with the
Caracalla it is. Thanks again, everyone! -Editor
To read the earlier E-Sylum article, see:
QUERY: ROMAN PROVINCIAL COIN ATTRIBUTION SOUGHT
Wayne Homren, Editor
The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization
promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org.
To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor
at this address: firstname.lastname@example.org
To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum
Copyright © 1998 - 2020 The Numismatic Bibliomania Society (NBS)
All Rights Reserved.
NBS Home Page
Contact the NBS webmaster