Numismatic research requires detective work. The March 1953 issue of The Numismatist from the American Numismatic Association
included an article invoking the fictional detective Sherlock Holmes to examine a mystery of the mis-attribution of three coins in the
1914 book El Duro by Adolfo Herrera. The article was republished April 23. 2016 on Greg Ruby's blog The Fourth Garrideb -
Numismatics of Sherlock Holmes. -Editor
Dramatis Personae: Sherlock Holmes and his friend, Dr. Watson. Scene: Sherlock Holmes’ study in London.
(Sherlock holds in one hand a registered package that has been opened and in the other hand, a large 8 reales silver coin of the Mexico
mint countermarked with a very aristocratic looking lion rampant. )
SHERLOCK: Watson, for the first time, we have at last a “corpus delicti” which we may examine minutely at our leisure and which will
give us a definite clue to this most interesting and extremely puzzling case. I am confident however that this coin never saw the sunshine
of Nicaragua in spite of what both Heiss, Herera and others say about it. In the first place, why should anyone place another “Spanish”
royal lion where two honest-to-goodness royal “Spanish” lions are already ramping their way in the ether towards the west? The coin is
already legal tender and how could another royal SPANISH (?) lion add to its reliability and acceptability in Nicaragua? Hand me my
magnifying glass so that I can examine that intruder more minutely. . . Why, Watson, this does not look like a Spanish lion! It looks to me
like one of those lions with a slick glossy coat and curling mane and a tail with its tassel curved backward and not forward as in the case
of its two Spanish companions — just like those lions that roamed around in the marshes of the Low Countries! Yes, very much like that
Brabant lion in an oval countermark on that silver crown of
Philip the Second dated 1558 which we purchased last month in Piccadilly.
WATSON: Yes, remarkably like that old 16th century countermark, but, Sherlock, the “dos Mundos” is an 18th century coin?
SHERLOCK: I do not think that any colonial die sinker could have modeled such a well engraved lion. Of course, the two Gils of the
Mexican Mint could have had a hand in it as they were about the best colonial engravers that Spain ever sent to her far-away colonial
mints. No, Watson, unless they were taking a vacation, they never would have left the Mexican mint even for a couple of months as there was
no mint in Nicaragua at that time and what enjoyment would there be for a master engraver like Gil to spend a vacation where there was no
mint in which he could wander around. You know, Watson, even an old master may sometimes be a victim of mistaken judgment and of excessive
enthusiasm. Take Herera, that grand old man. In his El Duro he ascribed three duros to a non-existing Nicaragua mint, coins which, I
believe, are now recognized as being of South and not of Central American provenance and their NR is not NICA-RAGUA but Nuevo Reino! Could
he not have been mistaken when, following Heiss, he ascribed the lion duro to Nicaragua?
WATSON: But, Sherlock, was there not a medal or token struck for but probably not in Leon, Nicaragua, which shows clearly a lion rampant
on the reverse?
SHERLOCK: Yes, Watson, a lion, yes, a lion, and a ramping lion at that, but let us take it out of my cabinet and examine it closely. You
will note, dear Watson, that in the Leon coin the lion does ramp but it ramps on a plank and is pushing a huge ball from the plank into the blue,
piratical Caribbean Sea. Furthermore, he does not ramp towards the west as all respectable Iberian lions usually ramp but undoubtedly towards the
east. Therefore, the lion of this 8 reales, if we are to believe in heraldry, is definitely not the ball-pushing lion of “la noble ciudad de Leon” in
Nicaragua and is therefore not from the capital city of Nicaragua. That, Watson, is the “quid, ” finally and definitely solved. I think that we may
now state that the lion countermark never saw the skies of Nicaragua in spite of what Heiss, Herera and other famous cataloguers have said.
Furthermore, I would wager that the engraver of the die for the countermark never left Europe and never saw any overseas colony.
WATSON: But, Sherlock, how does this help us? We have not yet solved the problem of where the coin does come from.
The rest of the story can be read online, and ANA members can find the original 1953 article in the Numismatist archive. -Editor
To read the complete article, see:
The Case of the Lion Countermark (1953)
(http://fourthgarrideb.com/2016/04/the-case-of-the-lion-countermark-1951/)
Wayne Homren, Editor
The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization
promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org.
To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor
at this address: whomren@gmail.com
To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum
Copyright © 1998 - 2024 The Numismatic Bibliomania Society (NBS)
All Rights Reserved.
NBS Home Page
Contact the NBS webmaster
|