An article by Jim Laughlin in the June 2016 issue of The E-Gobrecht (a publication of the Liberty Seated Collectors Club) reprints
some interesting articles on the use and circulation of U.S. Trade Dollars from contemporary Oregon newspapers published in 1875 and
1876. Here's an excerpt. -Editor
As a snapshot in time, it is interesting to come across a firsthand account of trade dollars in circulation domestically. Astoria, as well
as most of the Oregon country at that time was quite isolated, having no rail connections with California or with the East. While essential
self-sufficient for food, it was dependent upon San Francisco, 700 miles to the south, to supply its manufactured and luxury goods needs via
steamship and sailing vessels.
Here in late May 1876, the Treasurer indicates “... that people generally paid their taxes this year in silver”.....and that,
“...3⁄4 of all the taxes paid into the Treasury of Clatsop county, was silver and a very material proportion of that was Trade
Dollars.”
Of note, the Treasurer has qualified his statement by using the wording that most individuals paid their taxes in silver “this year.”
Thus making a distinction that taxes in previous years were paid differently, and that meant gold coin. Legal Tender paper currency likely
was not accepted by the County Government, any one holding such notes had to go to a brokerage house of bank and exchange the paper notes
for gold or silver coin at a steep discount. The financial page in the same paper indicates you could get 88 cents per paper dollar.
Trade dollars were expected to have been exported and used in trade with the Orient, but the law creating them had also included the
provision that they were legal tender domestically in amounts up to $5.
This matched the same legal tender limits that applied to the silver subsidiary coin (i.e. half, quarter, 20c, dime, and half-dime).
Gold coin was legal tender in any amounts, but people could refuse to accept silver coin in amounts greater than $5.
There was however a distinct difference between trade dollars and subsidiary silver coin. Subsidiary silver coin was only supposed to be
obtainable from the Government by exchanging gold coin for them, whereas, anyone holding silver bullion could take that bullion to the Mint
and have it converted into trade dollars, 378 grains of pure silver to a coin, and pay a nominal “minting charge,” which was required to be
the actual cost the Mint expended to coin the bullion received, and walk away with a dollar coin that was legal tender up to $5.
What had happened since the trade dollars were created in 1873, silver bullion prices (priced in gold coin) had declined so much, that
the cost of 378 grains of silver along with the nominal minting charge to coin a single trade dollar coin, was actually less than the
dollar face value that the coin would bring in domestic circulation. Thus, people that had access to silver bullion and were in the know,
started taking their bullion to the Mint and having it converted into trade dollars, spending them domestically. Thus making a profit on
each coin spent. Carothers in his book Fractional Currency, indicates that the tipping point occurred with the price of silver in
early 1876, and by the middle of 1876, trade dollar coins were flooding retail trade in California.
For more information on the Liberty Seated Collectors Club, see:
www.lsccweb.org
Wayne Homren, Editor
The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization
promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org.
To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor
at this address: whomren@gmail.com
To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum
Copyright © 1998 - 2024 The Numismatic Bibliomania Society (NBS)
All Rights Reserved.
NBS Home Page
Contact the NBS webmaster
|