Larry Lee writes:
This week's issue of Science News has two articles of the origins of money, both taken from a symposium in April sponsored by the
Society for American Archeology.
The two articles are "Conflict reigns of the history and origins of money" and "How an ancient stone money system works like
cryptocurrency". Make sure to read both the bibliography and the comments section as well as the articles. The articles outline two viewpoints
on the origin of money: one from the economists and one from the ethnologists.
Guess there was no reason to ask the opinion of the numismatists.
Thanks. Here are excerpts from each. Interesting theories, at least. The snarky comments of academics dissing one another are amusing. -Editor
How an ancient stone money system works like cryptocurrency
At least several hundred years ago, islanders on Yap in western Micronesia used principles at the heart of cryptocurrencies to conduct business, says
archaeologist Scott Fitzpatrick of the University of Oregon in Eugene.
Ownership of a disk could be transferred, for instance, as a wedding gift, to secure political allies or in exchange for food from residents of
nearby islands after a severe storm. These deals also occurred in front of the whole community. No matter who acquired a rai, it stayed in its
original location.
Bitcoin and blockchain work in much the same way, Fitzpatrick says. Bitcoin “miners” solve complex mathematical puzzles to release units of
currency. Those units are transported and securely stored across the public blockchain ledger. Full transaction histories for each bitcoin are
available to all network participants. Bitcoins can be exchanged for goods or services or given away at any time by participants in the digital
system.
To read the complete article, see:
How an ancient stone money system works like
cryptocurrency (https://www.sciencenews.org/article/yap-stone-money-bitcoin-blockchain-cryptocurrency?tgt=nr)
Conflict reigns over the history and origins of money
Economists have held one view of money’s origins for hundreds of years. But a growing number of anthropologists and archaeologists, holding a
revisionist view, say that economists’ standard story is bankrupt.
Economists and revisionists alike agree that an object defined as money works in four ways: First, it serves as a means for exchanging goods and
services. Currency enables payment of debts. It represents a general measure of value, making it possible to calculate prices of all sorts of items.
And, finally, money can be stored as a wealth reserve.
From there, the two groups split. Mainstream economists assume that bartering of goods and services inspired money’s invention. Anthropologists
and archaeologists contend that early states invented currency as a means of debt payment.
To read the complete article, see:
Conflict reigns over the history and origins of money
(https://www.sciencenews.org/article/money-ancient-origins-debate-mystery?tgt=nr)
Wayne Homren, Editor
The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization
promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org.
To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor
at this address: whomren@gmail.com
To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum
Copyright © 1998 - 2024 The Numismatic Bibliomania Society (NBS)
All Rights Reserved.
NBS Home Page
Contact the NBS webmaster
|