PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V6 2003 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE
The E-Sylum: Volume 6, Number 54, December 21, 2003, Article 7 BIDDLE, THE BANK, AND W. L. ORMSBY Coincidentally, Dave Bowers mentioned Ormsby in a note on a completely different subject. He writes: "I enjoyed the info on the BANK OF THE UNITED STATES. For a long time I have been gathering data on the Second Bank of the U.S. (1816-1836), including federal documents, contemporary financial accounts, etc. The popularly published histories of this bank are fascinating--as few people have ever delved into the SOURCE material. Also, Nicholas Biddle, who engaged in fraud after the Bank of the United States lost its federal charter and was then chartered by Pennsylvania, is hardly ever noticed in this connection--almost an untouchable subject (the record is clear--he engaged in illegal practices, many of his associates lost large amounts of money, etc., and if his name had been John Doe he would have been disgraced). The main cause of the Panic of 1837 was rampant inflation, not the failure of the Second Bank of the U.S. to be rechartered. In the west (then Indiana, Illinois, etc.) there were great land speculations. Jackson's "Specie Circular" put an end to buying land by "paying" for it with essentially worthless paper. If anyone doubts that popular histories often do not mesh with facts gained in numismatic and financial research, just pick up a copy of Schlesinger's prize-winning The Age of Jackson book, and read all about Hard Times tokens, bank scrip, etc. (hint: there is hardly anything mentioned). The Second Bank of the U.S. opened "subscriptions" in 1816 at its various branches, including Portsmouth, NH. If any E-Sylum subscribers have any printed currency or memorabilia specifically relating to the Portsmouth Branch I would be delighted to receive it to add to what David Sundman and I have (we've been gathering New Hampshire bank history, and if I were to print out the stuff on the Bank of the U.S., Portsmouth Branch, probably 50 pages would be used -- but, still, there are many unanswered questions and puzzles). Concerning the Second Bank of the U.S. (all over, not just Portsmouth), it is not often realized that most everyday citizens in the hinterlands -- did not like the bank. The reason was that other banks were state-chartered, were in general loosely regulated, could issue lots of currency with the hope that some of it would become lost or never redeemed, etc. There were state-chartered banks everywhere, and within any given state they had huge political clout--as they provided loans for the sinews of trade and commerce. The Bank of the U.S. was viewed as Enemy No. 1, and all across America the various local and regional bankers had no difficulty enlisting political solons to join them in this opinion. The Second Bank of the U.S. in Philadelphia was a spectacular example of the Greek Revival style (as was the 2nd Philadelphia Mint) and was widely reproduced on engravings---easily enough found today. Later, it was used for other purposes. While I am at it, a particular interest of mine is the history of bank-note engraving and engravers, mostly pre the Bureau of Engraving and Printing era. This field is very rich for research, and somewhat resembles that of early American silversmiths and pewterers (another interest) in that most publications simply copy other publications, there are vast errors in dating, spelling, etc. As a sample, as part of a biographical study of Waterman Lily Ormsby, I once checked all of the "standard" sources including numismatic publications, the Essay-Proof Journal (articles by Julian Blanchard), Groce & Wallace, Hamilton, Fielding, and others on engraving, and just about all say the same thing. And, all misspell his middle name as LILLY (probably thinking of Eli Lilly pharmaceuticals!). Again, I probably have 50 to 100 pages on Waterman, but, ironically, almost all gathered item by item, with no big help from numismatic sources (except from none other than Eric P. Newman, who loaned me an item I had never seen). Someday I may issue a Dictionary of Early American Bank Note Engravers and Printers, simply because this is a book I would enjoy owning now, and nothing like it even remotely exists. The main problem with printed sources is that, in actuality, a bank note partnership that expired years earlier may have an imprint of, say, 1855, on a piece of currency -- the result of an early plate being dusted off, and a later date entered on it. Accordingly, I have found my best sources are contemporary documents and newspaper records, and, a distant second, early town and city directories. However, newspapers are hard to find and tedious to read. Wayne, keep up the good work." Wayne Homren, Editor The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org. To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor at this address: whomren@coinlibrary.com To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum | |
PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V6 2003 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE