PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V9 2006 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE
The E-Sylum: Volume 9, Number 41, October 8, 2006, Article 18 DAVE LANGE ON ABOLISHING THE CENT Dave Lange writes: "Whenever the subject of abolishing the lower value coins comes up in conversation, I use the following argument with those who claim it would be inflationary: The lowest value coin in the USA for the past 150 years or so has been the cent. If one factors in 150 years of inflation, it's easy to see that the purchasing power of the cent at that time is likely equal to or greater than that of the quarter dollar today, so we should easily be able to manage our commerce with no coin valued less than 25 cents. This typically brings all further discussion to a halt. When Gail Baker sent out an email recently, asking individuals to comment on the question of whether the cent should be abolished, I sent her a fairly long answer. As it is, the ANA newsletter reproduced just one line of this to summarize my position. I would like to resubmit the entire text here, since I put some considerable thought into it: "The cent is a useless coin that has possessed only sentimental value for the past 30 years. While it may be permitted to continue as a unit of account, much as the mil does with respect to gasoline prices, no coin of this denomination should be manufactured. Transactions ending in odd cent values should be just rounded up or down to the nearest five cents. "A timeless measure of a coin's utility is the following simple question: Can any item or service, however small, be purchased with just a single coin of this value? If the answer is no, then the coin is too valueless to be practical. Under this rule, the cent ceased to be an effective coin with the double-digit inflation of the 1970s. The nickel and dime are likewise condemned by such a test, though the latter should continue for a few more years as the smallest coined division of the dollar. "It is impossible to manufacture one-cent pieces made from any material, no matter how valueless, and still process and distribute them for less than one cent per unit. It has already been established that the actual cost of doing this is well over the coin's face value. This has been true for many years, but the loss was somewhat hidden within the seignorage (profit) realized from coining of the higher denominations. "The cent remains in production today due to a combination of government inertia and vested interests within both the government and private industry. It is likely that the U. S. Mint's staffing requirements would be reduced by elimination of the cent, and the letting go of federal employees is a rarely sought solution to any problem. Lobbyists for the zinc industry (this being the major component of our current cents) operate behind a confusingly titled group whose name was carefully selected to sound like a public interest organization. By soliciting surveys that utilize questions phrased in such a manner as to manipulate the resulting answers in its favor, this group can proclaim that Americans still want their pennies. "Other nations have successfully eliminated their smaller coins, while simultaneously replacing the lower-valued paper notes with coins of equivalent value. By doing this these countries have provided a useful mix of coins over a range of values that enable purchases to be made with the fewest number of coins. Contrast this to the USA, where just buying a soft drink from a vending machine typically requires the use of numerous, small value coins. The only alternative is to feed dollar notes that are frequently rejected by the machine for wear or damage. Coins that more closely represent the range of prices found for such commonly vended items would solve this awkward situation and speed up all cash transactions in general. As for the lowly cent, it has been many years since these were accepted by vending machines and parking meters at all. "The coining of cents for circulation should be terminated very soon, though they may continue to be included in the U. S. Mint's sets made specifically for collectors. This would in no way impeded the issuance of the commemorative cents for the bicentennial of Abraham Lincoln's birth in 2009. Such coins would likely be hoarded by collectors and speculators in any case, preventing their general circulation. "There is simply no point in maintaining the illusion that the cent is a useful component in commerce. It is now just a historic relic of America's past." Wayne Homren, Editor The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org. To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor at this address: whomren@coinlibrary.com To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum | |
PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V9 2006 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE