Quoting Jim Woodrick, the Historic Preservation Division Director of the Mississippi Department of Archives and History, a November 23,
2015 article on the blog Atlas Obscura credits businessman Oliver Pollock with creating the dollar sign. The article doesn't
cite other sources, so I'm not sure if Woodrick or the author knew of Eric Newman's work on the topic. Here's an excerpt.
-Editor
Wars cost money. So when the Revolutionary War broke out, the Colonies turned to a number of sources for backing. The top contributors
to America’s Independence: The Kingdoms of France and Spain, the Dutch banking conglomerate, and a single Irish merchant based in New
Orleans. His name was Oliver Pollock, and he was the “Financier of the Revolution in the West.”
Pollock saw opportunity in war– the chance for a young but wealthy immigrant to stand as a symbol of success and greatness. He desired
to carve out a place for himself in America’s financial landscape and perhaps even leave a mark in the nation’s history. He achieved all
those things. Just not in the way he expected.
America was a British colony in revolt, so the preferred currency became the Spanish dollar, also known as Spanish peso, which was
commonly obtained through illicit trade in the Spanish Caribbean. This was the exact manner of trade in which Oliver Pollock made his
fortune. Pollock reached into his own deep pockets and made available to the American war cause 300,000 Spanish pesos. That amount is
valued at roughly one billion dollars in today’s currency.
It was a massive sum, even for someone as wealthy as Pollock, but he gladly parted with it in order to back the revolution. After all,
Pollock was Irish, and he believed that fighting Britain was his duty. As important as it was to root for the right horse, Pollock was
still a businessman; he believed a sizable investment in the Revolution would pay dividends in the long run–and give him access to some of
the most famous names in America.
When Pollock reached out to the Founding Fathers to support his new plan, they had no problem backing their man in New Orleans.
“Investors were willing to purchase because of the public support given Pollock by Thomas Jefferson, who then served as Governor of
Virginia,” explains Light Townsend Cummins in his paper “Oliver Pollock and George Rogers Clarks’ Service of Supply: A Case Study in
Financial Disaster.”
The “Financial Disaster” part of the aforementioned title gives away what happened next–Oliver Pollock went broke. The expensive cost of
raising of armies and supplies left him with nothing. To make matters worse, as a result of some favorable re-negotiating on the bills of
exchange he had issued, he was made liable for them, as opposed to the merchant companies and the state congresses who originally backed
them.
His creditors came looking for repayment. Pollock had no choice but to turn to his Northern friends for help. “Letters from
Pollock...were read on the floor of Congress, and the Commercial Committee resolved that the U.S. Treasury should pay Pollock more than
twenty thousand dollars…” writes Kathleen DuVal, in Independence Lost: Lives on the Edge of the American Revolution. But neither
Congress or the state of Virginia had twenty thousand dollars to spare.
Oliver Pollock backed the right horse. It just didn’t pay off.
Ironically, said nation-building did include Secretary of Finance Alexander Hamilton’s plan to establish a strong central bank and
currency. Washington’s Superintendent of Finance, and Pollock’s close friend and business partner, Robert Morris–himself a key financial
backer of the Revolution–began the process by sifting through the countless ledgers sent to Congress by Pollock, who, per Dr. Cummins,“kept
careful record of these amounts, noting both the Bills which he received and the supplies which he purchased.”
It was with those ledgers that Oliver Pollock finally achieved his dream of providing America with an important, lasting contribution. Not
the numbers, but the poor penmanship that accompanied them.
“Pollock...entered the abbreviation ‘ps’ by the figures for ‘peso.’ Because Pollock recorded these Spanish “dollars” or “pesos” as ‘ps”
and because he tended to run both letters together, the resulting symbol resembled a ‘$,’” says Jim Woodrick, the Historic Preservation
Division Director of the Mississippi Department of Archives and History.
That’s it. Historians have analyzed the source of the $ symbol and have yet to find it written down prior to Pollock’s use in his
ledgers. His unintentional creation is supported by the fact that Robert Morris chose to adopt the symbol and by 1797 had it cast in type
in Philadelphia as the official symbol for new nation’s own currency.
Meanwhile, Oliver Pollock did the only thing he could do. He declared bankruptcy in early 1782 and liquidated his assets and personal
possessions.
Oliver Pollock is proof that while money can buy many things–from victorious armies to powerful connections–it can’t guarantee what
sometimes happens by accident: a legacy.
To read the complete article, see:
THE BANKRUPT IRISHMAN WHO
CREATED THE DOLLAR SIGN BY ACCIDENT (www.atlasobscura.com/articles/the-bankrupt-irishman-who-created-the-dollar-sign-by-accident)
Wayne Homren, Editor
The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization
promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org.
To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor
at this address: whomren@gmail.com
To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum
Copyright © 1998 - 2020 The Numismatic Bibliomania Society (NBS)
All Rights Reserved.
NBS Home Page
Contact the NBS webmaster
|