PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V9 2006 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE
The E-Sylum: Volume 9, Number 40, October 1, 2006, Article 8 DAVID GANZ ON THE MONACO CENTRAL AMERICA GOLD SEIZURE Regarding last week's item about the seizure of Monaco Financial's artifacts from the Central America at the recent Long Beach coin show, David L. Ganz of Ganz & Hollinger, P.C writes: "What was behind the seizure is hard to grasp and relates to a law suit that Monaco Financial is not even a party to. That law suit is a dispute involving a claim by investors in Recovery Limited Partnership and Columbus Exploration, LLC, which first discovered the wreck of the S.S. Central America and then figured out how to extricate the treasure. Nine individual plaintiffs and International Deep Sea Survey, Inc., brought suit earlier this year in Ohio State Court against Recovery Limited and Columbus Exploration, claiming that despite substantial recovery and sales efforts, they had been denied access to the partnership books and an accounting. The treasure salvors removed the case to the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of Ohio, a remedy they are allowed to do because of the nature of the claims under which a maritime contract was deemed a federal and not a state question. A series of ancillary proceedings have taken place in U.S. District Courts in New York and California, but the granddaddy of them all is located in the Eastern District of Virginia, where the S.S. Central America litigation has been ongoing for nearly 20 years. After finding the Central America, the group brought an "in rem" proceeding in admiralty seeking to establish ownership of and the right to salvage the ship and its cargo of gold and other artifacts. Under salvage law, the original owners still retain their ownership interests in such property. It competes with the law of finders which, in contrast, expresses the ancient and honorable principle of finders, keepers. Meanwhile, the financial backers claim they received no remuneration and asked that the Court issue process for attachment and garnishment in the amount of $11,909,880 "against all goods, chattles, credits... claimed by, being held for or on behalf of, or being transferred for the benefit of" the Columbus Group. This is without an adjudication by a Court of the complaint, because the same remedy was sought and executed on in a New York Court as well as the Monaco seizure. Hundreds of documents are on file in the federal directory, some of which are sealed, others of which, including the operating agreement of the venture, are claims to be secret but are now available for viewing. Monaco, for its part, claims it bought the ingots outright and that the Columbus group has no financial interest in the gold ingots which, by weight alone - numismatic value not considered - has a bullion worth exceeding $3-million. Stay tuned." Wayne Homren, Editor The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a non-profit organization promoting numismatic literature. See our web site at coinbooks.org. To submit items for publication in The E-Sylum, write to the Editor at this address: whomren@coinlibrary.com To subscribe go to: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/esylum | |
PREV ARTICLE
NEXT ARTICLE
FULL ISSUE
PREV FULL ISSUE
V9 2006 INDEX
E-SYLUM ARCHIVE